At all times, the most pressing issue of mankind was considered to be his awareness of his place in the universe. And in these discussions, the Creator was always considered a key moment. The answer to this question directly depends on its presence or absence.
The presence or absence of creativity in the universe has always been based on three pillars of human collective knowledge: paradoxes, conscience and love. It is these three elements that conscious function has always correlated directly with God. That is, a person could never explain the listed aspects with anything other than a supernatural beginning. For example, the global nature of the Universe, its ability to evolve, the quality of matter to appear as if from nothing and turn into the most unthinkable forms has always been attributed by the human mind to irrationality and to the infinite Reason of the crown of creation - to God.
Such a solution could take place under one single condition, when a person, as a bearer of a conscious function, could give the palm of the essence to something more developed in terms of mental creativity - for example, to God. But here a lot of questions arise that can never be in harmony with newly emerging facts in the process of the academic or scientific development of mankind. It is no coincidence that a reasonable person categorically separates the concepts of hypothetically “believing” and reliably “knowing”.
In short, the academic concept of "paradox", the semi-scientific from psychology, "unconscious" and religious "god" have the same source of knowledge of the outside world. And therefore, the acceptance of the understanding that over time, science will further and further be introduced into the "zone of shadow", illuminating in the literal sense ignorance and that part of knowledge that is now in imbalance with some laws of the universe, called man's irrational (illogical) principle seems to be an exclusively correct approach to the problem of studying the external world.
In addition, it is important to understand that the Universe cannot develop irrationally if its creative principle in the form of a conscious function, the carrier of which is a person, is endowed with the only tool for knowing its legislative initiative - logic. That is, it is the logical or rational aspect of cognition that leads to an understanding of the process of building the Universe, which is also based on the logical principle.
So, the "paradox" in its hypostasis of the destruction of the logical (human) principle can be considered defeated by the mind. It remains to deal with the concepts of "conscience" and "love", to which adherents of the principle of the divine principle of the universe always appeal. And here it is precisely the fact of acceptance of conscience and love for mental organization that begins at the very beginning of reasoning to confuse the whole picture. Indeed, accepting a person not only as a carrier of physiology and reason, but also as a divine essence of a lower hierarchy than the Creator himself, the concept of the soul was introduced, which, analogously to the “paradox, ” does not lend itself to understandable logical analysis.
With such a distribution of forces, a certain crown is created for God, who simply cannot be realized, but is a kind of "black box", the decoding of which is impossible. Moreover, it is precisely “love” and “conscience” in this pseudo-rational construction of reasoning that are traditionally accepted in the form of evidence of the “mental organization” of a person. After all, no one can reliably understand the principles of these concepts, because it is in them that a lot of contradictions to ordinary logic are concentrated. For example, a clear villain may suffer from attacks of conscience, and a notorious cynic may undergo powerful impulses of love. Such a correlation of human characters and manifestations of conscience and love, it would seem, does not correspond to logic and is easier to correlate precisely with the "paradox" or God!
But everything changes if we accept the absence of the soul, and the introduced concepts of "conscience" and "love" are taken as products of a conscious function. That is, it is the rationale that forms the "conscience", which plays the most primitive role in the consciousness of the individual - his safety in society. After all, only this tool can protect an individual from the contradiction of living together in a team.
With love, the situation is even simpler, if, again, follow the above logic. Love attraction (not a physiological passion at the level of body chemistry!) Arises with the maximum coincidence of the object of romantic research with its image, which every person has as a kind of standard. This image is the pure product of the conscious function, and, in addition, it is the conscious function that produces the natural analysis of the object of study with the reference sample.
Summing up all of the above, one simple thing should be understood - only the conscious function of a person can be regarded as the crown of creation of the universe. And therefore, the religious concept of God, who lives in the heart of every believer, is correlated in such an analysis among atheists with a conscious function based on the cerebral cortex. By the way, the collective knowledge of all mankind in this sense can be regarded as the religious epithets of the Creator: Omnipresent, Infinite and Almighty.